Friday, December 31, 2010

#192-FTW

Dear QueryShark:


One week ago, Claire's cousin Dinah slit her wrists.

Five days ago, Claire found Dinah's diary and discovered why.

Three days ago, Claire stopped crying and came up with a plan.

Two days ago, she ditched her piercings and bleached the black dye from her hair.

Yesterday, knee socks and uniform plaid became a predator's camouflage.

Today, she'll find the boy who broke Dinah.

By tomorrow, he'll wish he was dead.

Premeditated is a 60,000 word contemporary YA novel. Chapters or a synopsis are available on request.



oh hell yes.  Send pages, send the entire manuscript NOW.

Here's why this breaks all the rules and still works:  

It's got menace in the very rhythm of the writing. It's short and not-sweet.  We know who the main characters are because she SHOWED us, not TOLD us.

And by god, there's nothing better than revenge for the New Year.

Yes, this breaks all the rules I've been yapping about, except the one that really counts: it entices me to read on.

Now, how the hell do you know if you've got something that breaks the rules but works?  First, you write something that doesn't break ANY of the rules.  You write a query that shows, doesn't tell. That's concise, and conveys what the book is about.

In other words, you write to the form of a query letter before you write something that ISN'T to form.

And you pay attention to rhythm.  More than anything else stylistically, it's that rhythm of good writing that's toughest to teach and learn.  When I'm editing manuscripts, I say the sentences out loud a lot. Hearing them helps me see where there are extra words, or too many beats, or misplaced beats.  It's very very slow editing when you are down to moving syllables in sentences, but it's what makes the difference between gorgeous writing and so-so sentences.




76 comments:

  1. I'd hit 'add to cart' if this had a button.

    Author, I seriously hope the book is as good as the query and that it hits the shelves ASAP.

    Very well done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Saying it out loud sounds like a very good tip indeed.
    This query feels like a movie teaser.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow. If the book is as good as the query, this writer will snag an agent and book deal in no time. Best of luck and happy new year!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow. This is outstanding. {So much so that I, the typically silent blog lurker, was compelled to commment on it!}

    ReplyDelete
  5. That reads like flash fiction. And the pace picks up along the way, going from events two days apart to one day apart to one day in the future. The shortest sentences have the biggest punch, too.

    Cool!

    ReplyDelete
  6. That is wonderful. I want to read it right now too!

    ReplyDelete
  7. "When I'm editing manuscripts, I say the sentences out loud a lot. Hearing them helps me see where there are extra words, or too many beats, or misplaced beats. It's very very slow editing when you are down to moving syllables in sentences, but it's what makes the difference between gorgeous writing and so-so sentences."

    ^^THIS!^^

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Lisbeth Salander, the Early Years." Oh, yeah!

    I'd jump on this one too if there were a "buy" button.

    Best of luck to you, author!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow. That's amazing. So simple and rule-breaking, but so awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I loved this! The countdown layout was freaky-scary. Remind me not to ever get in Claire's way.

    ReplyDelete
  11. That's the reward you get for slaving away to master the basic and the traditional. You gain a depth of understanding that enables you write your OWN goddamn rules!

    ReplyDelete
  12. And that's a blurb that would make me instantly buy the book. That does not happen very often for me. Way to go! I sure hope the book lives up to this query. If not I'll be mad!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I can't wait to read this when it's published.

    My answer to any potential "but this isn't a traditional query letter" blah blah: from my point of view, this is a fantastic YA voice. If you can do your query letter in an equally spot-on voice for your genre/subgenre, try it and I bet La Shark will like it.

    And the thing is that this querier manages to do both things well: display their grasp of a compelling YA voice AND get all the business done (word count, etc.) deftly.

    Bravo to this querier!

    ReplyDelete
  14. WOW! My only hope is that the actual book holds up to such a great teaser.

    In my writer's group there has often been debate on what is the best way to critique...read an excerpt out loud, then the group comments, or read silently and then group discussion. I am always one who votes for read out loud. I catch SO many mistakes in my own work that way. Others argue that stories are meant for the reader to read to themselves silently and that's how we should read the work before discussing. I do not agree. Thanks for backing me up!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nicely done and as others have said I hope the manuscript is as well done as the query.

    No pressure, author. =D

    ReplyDelete
  16. Huh, bubba, Claire going all old testament and stuff on a wrongdoer. Edgy, what we all feel like doing when horribly slighted. Many dramatic questions artfully raised, noteably what's Claire's final outcome. What changes do the obstacles along the way to her goal evoke in her. How is she transformed into what new normal.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Congrats, author!

    I'd suggest you capitalize PREMEDITATED.

    ReplyDelete
  18. FAN-FREAKIN'-TASTIC.

    Seriously... poster of this-- can I read. :) PLEASE!

    ReplyDelete
  19. "I'd hit 'add to cart' if this had a button." <--- THIS!!!! Oh wow, I can't wait to see this hit shelves! Sounds AMAZING!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yes, if the query is this good, one can imagine how good the book is. She can write, surely, BUT -- she can control the reader's mind and soul by her writing.

    Lesson learned :-)

    ReplyDelete
  21. Um, do you have an account on fictionpress??? I want to read this!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  22. OMG, this is a brilliant query. It almost reads like the author wrote the script for a book trailer and used that for the query. It is perfect for the set up of the story. I hope the book is as brilliant as the query. I'd definitely buy it.

    ReplyDelete
  23. #192 ...

    Way to go. What a great way to celebrate the New Year.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I wantto read this and I want to read it NOW.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I saw this over on Absolute Write! We loved it there too :D

    ReplyDelete
  26. Okay, I've officially gone from nerves over the query being to strange to work to nerves over the book not living up to expectation!

    *has freak out moment*

    =:-0

    Thank you for the comments. I'm glad you like the query. (And premise! Yay!)

    ReplyDelete
  27. Wow. That query gave me chills.
    Definitely WIN!

    ReplyDelete
  28. yes, it's a grabber of a query.

    my problem, though, is i don't have enough of a sense of the characters, the complications that arise from the conflict nor enough about the MC to take her beyond a 2D cardboard cut-out. (MC=revenge. is that really enough to carry a book?)

    i'd likely ask for a partial. i respect the different take on the query, but i don't have much of a sense as to the writer's ability to write. (movie trailer voice-overs don't work over the duration of a full-length movie)


    -- Tom

    ReplyDelete
  29. Great query. Reminds me of the movie Hard Candy.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Exactly! I love the pace on this query - and hope it makes it to publication, I want to read what happens next...

    ReplyDelete
  31. *smiles* I knew he had a winner with this one. I'll definitely read it when it comes out.

    ReplyDelete
  32. And this is how it's done!

    A knockout query. Fantastic sense of pace. Sign me up, please!

    ReplyDelete
  33. I never comment, but this is just so good. Yes, someone get this book to print. I'll buy it.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I'm not really a reader of YA, but I WANT this book. I hope the book is as good as the teaser, sounds like a winner.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I don't normally read YA but I'd read this. I wish I could write a query half as good.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I think it's a really good query although I'm not as moved by the premise as everyone else is. I'd maybe go see the movie though :P

    ReplyDelete
  37. I freaking love how punchy this is. It gets everything across in such a small space, and as a lover of efficiency, I adore it. I think this will DEFINITELY get a ton of requests!

    ReplyDelete
  38. Query. Envy.

    Taking.

    OVER!!!!!!!!

    ;)

    ReplyDelete
  39. I definitely like the unorthodox approach, and the rhythm is perfect (I read it about ten times in a row before doing anything else). Honestly, it could say almost anything for me and I'd want to read it, because the writing and the feeling of it is so perfect, which leads me to assume that the writing in the book is equally impressive. Either way, 192 got some great reactions, so congrats!

    ReplyDelete
  40. Well done, Josin.

    You took a risk and it paid off - what a wonderful contrast to the over-written and convoluted queries that would land on QS's desk daily. No wonder she raved about it.

    You got the equivalent of a standing ovation!

    ReplyDelete
  41. I seem to be in the majority here - great query. I'm not sure it does break the rules though, at least not all of them.

    We know who the MC is, we know why she's doing (or going to do) what she's doing. We don't need to know what the boy did because we know what the result of his actions were. We know what the consequences of his actions and Claire's desire may bring.

    Revenge is always a good theme to have as we can all relate to it. The only issue here, is whether the diary was accurate and whether the boy actually did what he has been accused of ...

    Good luck, Josin - the pressure starts here!

    ReplyDelete
  42. Nice work, Josin! From your contributions to Nathan's blog, I know you've put in lots of hours to be able to write what looks like an effortless query. I'm pretty sure the novel will measure up as well.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I would read this; and it's not my preferred genre to read, so well done!

    I hope your novel stands up to it, if it does I will be keeping an eye out.

    ReplyDelete
  44. not at all my genre but I'd certainly click "sample now" if it were on Kindle.

    Rock on, author! Just when we think we've seen it all before, something like this comes along. Kudos to you and good luck with it!

    ReplyDelete
  45. Wow. This is one of the best queries I've ever seen. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Wow. Concise and jarring - voice, mood, it's all there. I'd want to read it!

    ReplyDelete
  47. Wow. What a phenomenal query! It told me exactly what I needed to know to get hooked, and with not one word wasted.

    I would buy this book in a heartbeat, along with any other book this author is working on. Can't wait to see the finished product. Job well done!

    ReplyDelete
  48. Brava, Josin! As others here have said, I don't generally read YA, but this - this I would pick up in a heartbeat. And it's all because of that sparkling jewel of a query you submitted. Well worth the visit to the Shark tank.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Oh wow. That's just awesome. I would read the hell outta that.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Somebody publish this ASAP. I desperately want to read it. Pretty please.

    That is, if the book is as fan-freakin-tastic as the query, of course...

    ReplyDelete
  51. I read this query on here about a week to 10 days ago, and I've been thinking about it ever since, and wanting to go back and re-read it. This morning I did come back to read it, and it still rocks. I'm just hoping Premeditated gets to the shelf soon. Great job. Really.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Love it. This is so the kind of thing I love to read. Would buy now if I could. I don't know who Josin is, but something tells me I will soon.

    I seriously got chills with the last line!

    Also, it's the editing, the lack of wordy-words that lets me know this book would rock.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I'm waiting for this book to hit the Kindle shelves. Can't wait to read it!

    ReplyDelete
  54. This is hot.
    I'll keep an eye out for it. Good luck.

    ReplyDelete
  55. I would so read this novel. Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
  56. best query ive ever read. part of the reason is that it is so memorable. besides that.... I don't know. it's really good. ^^

    ReplyDelete
  57. I got chills reading that. It's...well, it's just amazing.

    Each sentence tightens the tension knob. By the time you get to the end of it, you're falling off the edge of your seat.

    I'm not sure what rules it's supposed to be breaking. It seems to me it exemplifies them: it's concrete, it builds logically, it heightens the stakes, it leaves you wanting more.

    I'm very impressed.

    ReplyDelete
  58. I'm intrigued! Your query accomplishes the number one goal - I would read this story! Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Wow, I would read this in a heartbeat, and I don't even like YA books.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Wow...this format works very well for this query - its interesting, concise & I want to read the book. very nice Job!

    ReplyDelete
  61. I. Want. This. Book. If the book is as oustanding as the query, I will buy it the day it comes out, hands down and no questions asked.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Sounds terrific.

    But he'll wish he were dead, not he'll wish he was dead.

    The sentiment is great, the grammar not so much.

    Good luck.

    ReplyDelete
  63. So do we get to know how this turned out? Is this book out there some where or coming out? I want to read it!

    ReplyDelete
  64. @ Sharon:

    > But he'll wish he were dead, not he'll wish he was dead.

    The truth is on both sides. In published books at Google Books:

    "he'll wish he was dead"
    68 results
    http://tinyurl.com/7apjnj5

    "he'll wish he were dead"
    31 results
    http://tinyurl.com/8xyuxdo

    thus both are used by published (and educated) writers, and yours is just a tad less frequent.

    In prescriptive grammar, “wish” requires the subjunctive mood (which “were” is) after it.

    However, according say to Swan, Practical English Grammar (see "tense simplification"), in subordinates the subjunctive can be replaced by the simple past (in this case “was”).

    And “[that] he was dead” is a relative subordinate.

    Others formulate this as a replacement of the subjunctive “were” with the backshift to the past “was.”

    Thus your version is the most formal, but not the only correct.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Just in case anyone wondered--this book, and another by the author--sold. To a real publisher.

    QueryShark obviously knows a good query when she sees it--and a book with potential.

    One of this authors titles actually went to auction.

    Premeditated comes out next year with Delacorte.

    I, for one, am going to take anything the Shark says regarding a query I send her as absolute gospel.

    ReplyDelete
  66. @ Hope Welsh.

    You just answered my question. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Here's the cover reveal...

    http://josinlmcquein.blogspot.com/2012/08/premeditated-cover-reveal-for-real.html

    Congrats!!!

    ReplyDelete
  68. For anyone still interested: http://www.amazon.com/Premeditated-ebook/dp/B00CCPIHX8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1374700989&sr=8-1&keywords=premeditated I looked it up while making my way through the archives :) happy this query got picked up!

    ReplyDelete
  69. I just added Premeditated to my Amazon wish list. I only wish she used the query letter as the back of the book blurb (she didn't, maybe some details changed). Anyway, this query was awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  70. But this sounds so similar to the set-up for Jay Asher's THIRTEEN REASONS WHY ...

    ReplyDelete