Thursday, February 9, 2012

#218

Dear Query Shark,

What would happen if you and your child had a train set that could magically shrink you down to size?

You will be killed and eaten by the QueryBunny if you open your query with a rhetorical question. There's nothing like a rhetorical question to make the QueryBunny reach for the picnic hamper.





The QueryBunny and her picnic hamper filled with Hapless Writer Salads.


In our picture book, THE MAGIC TRAIN, Jorgen and his donut-loving daddy shrink to become the engineer and brakeman of the Magic Train. They zoom, clank, puff, and roar upstairs, downstairs, through all the bedrooms, and even into the garage. They encounter sleeping dolls, an erupting volcano, delicious crumbs in the kitchen, and a problem that can only be solved with a chocolate donut.

This is one of the best paragraphs I've seen about a picture book. I love the energetic words: Zoom! Clank! Puff! Roar! (it sounds like morning coffee at the Reef) I love the humor.

THE MAGIC TRAIN is a 620 words picture book that is a joy to read aloud to a train-loving 3-7 year old.


You''ve shown me that.  You don't need to tell me again.

We have included in this email the manuscript** and a picture book dummy featuring page layout and illustrations by Illustrious Illustrator. II's artwork has been published in  This place and That place Magazines. He held a children’s book design fellowship at Publisher. Illustrious illustrator also worked as an assistant to Uber-Illustrator the award-winning illustrator of Fabulous Book.




We believe that the unique voice and distinctive illustration style of this book would be a good fit for the Query Shark Literary Agency. THE MAGIC TRAIN will appeal to parents and children who also enjoy Dinosaur Train, Shark vs. Train and other books inspired by playtime make-believe worlds.

I assume that if you query me, you think we're a good fit. You don't need to tell me again. 

Although we hope you would consider our text and illustrations as a package, we understand and respect your preference to select illustrations. We are willing to have the manuscript and artwork considered separately.


We are submitting the manuscript and illustrated dummy to multiple publishers and agents simultaneously.

NO! NO! NO!   Do not submit to publishers while you submit to agents.  This handicaps your future agent in ways you do not want to imagine.  If a publisher turns you down pre-agent-snag, it's hard for the agent to go back and say "yanno, you made a terrible mistake saying no to this."  Query agents first.

Thank you for your consideration,



**Notice that ALL the text of the book is included in the query.  That's the right thing to do. 


This is an excellent example of a query for a picture book. 
Polish it up, and you're good to go.

31 comments:

  1. The bunny! Why is that bunny not a television superstar already?

    The query was very good, but it won me over at "crumbs".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow. That IS a good picture book query. However, my feeling has always been that's it's better to query publishers directly with picture books. Are agents generally interested in them? I've heard no. Thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  3. It sounds a bit like the middle-grade novel MEASLE AND THE WRATHMONK, by Ian Ogilvy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I love the query bunny!

    Also, thanks for including this query! So often, the examples I see for strong queries are for high-stakes, suspenseful stories, so it's illuminating to see how to craft a successful query for something that's fun rather than dramatic.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for sharing this one! I love seeing a good picture book query. It's very helpful. :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. This sounds like an awesome picture book, if the art and text are as great as the query. I would totally buy it -- and I don't even have kids :P

    ReplyDelete
  7. Loved having a good example of picture book query!

    Still, I cannot be the only one who thought the Query Bunny would be more along the lines of the Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I was excited about the book, until the picture loaded. That is a freaking ADORABLE bunny.

    Ahem, but seriously. If this gets published, I want to get it. It sounds wonderful.

    Thank you for showing us a different type, but equally interesting query. I'm surprised how much I can learn about queries when they're a completely different book type.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow, this is a really good one overall. :) The mistakes seem glaring once you point them out, but they're the sort of mistakes that are understandable.

    ...the very cuteness of that bunny is absolutely terrifying.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I love children's books. At the end of the post, I was disappointed I didn't get to read this book!

    I love the description of "donut-loving Daddy", I can just picture a happy fat daddy with a smile on his face.

    This sounded so endearing. I'm smiling like a fool now.

    ReplyDelete
  11. A think a lot of problems can only be solved with a chocolate doughnut.

    Sounds like a fun book, which comes out in the query.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The erupting volcano and delicious crumbs side-by-side were possibly the most intriguing part. A volcano in their house??

    And I suppose the fact that I jump straight to asking about the story just shows how much I like the query. :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well, I must say that I'm captivated by the bunny and the contents of his basket.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I find it highly unfair (but adorable) that picture books get the Query Bunny and YA gets the Shark. Hmm...something in between the Bunny and Shark. May I suggest:

    Barkley - The cuddly Golden Retriever yet sassy adolescent with a fetch yourself attitude.

    Yea, this is me procrastinating.

    ReplyDelete
  15. How am I supposed to discuss the query coherently now? The Query Bunny smashed my brain with her Cute-by-four.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Dear QueryShark, What would happen if an otherwise really good query opened with a crappy rhetorical question?

    ReplyDelete
  17. This sounds like a wonderful picture book. I would absolutely buy it to read and show to my grandkids.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I agree with other commenters: it's great to see a very different kind of query (i.e., picture book as opposed to YA or Adult) thrown to The Shark. As usual, your comments nail the problems precisely, Janet. And the story summary is excellent. Good job, Writer!

    ReplyDelete
  19. This query is so cute, and that bunny is adorable! I didn't know much about picture book queries before this, so I enjoyed reading this post and learning something new :)

    ReplyDelete
  20. I admit, I REALLY want to know what problem can only be solved by a chocolate donut.

    Also, as an illustrator myself, I am pleasantly surprised to find an author who realizes that a publisher will very possibly want to pick the illustrations themselves rather than go with the ones supplied (even if the illustrator is established as this one clearly is). I cannot count how many times I say I do children's illustration and people are like "Oh! I've written a children's book that needs illustration before I can submit it..." Glad to see some people DO do the research.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hmm, I must have missed something when I researched picture book submissions. I thought they required cover letters (like short stories) instead of queries. After all, the guidelines almost always ask for the full text. And when a query is roughly half the length of the book, why would an agent or publisher waste time reading a description when they can just read the accompanying manuscript?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yikes. I wish this post had gone up a couple of months ago. I attended a conference recently. The editors from three big publishing houses invited conference attendees to submit, and -- gulp -- I did. I am really hoping that isn't going to kill me in the agent search process.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Marina, I hear you and have thought the same thing for a long while. Why a query, when the whole manuscript is attached and, perhaps, takes less time to read then the query itself?
    Then I realized, often BECAUSE a PB manuscript will have very little to sometimes no text, and relies so heavily on the Illustration to tell much of the story, without a query, the manuscript may not make sense?

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'm not surprised that a query for a PB included the full text as they are so short. What I am surprised about is that the agent had no comment on the length of the text over 600 words as I get slammed in critiques for anything over 500 words!

    ReplyDelete
  25. ALL my query drafts start with a rhetorical question. I swear I read that was good for picture books. I better stay out of the ocean until I make some edits.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Nothing but mad love for the Query Bunny ... well, mad love and fear ...

    ReplyDelete
  27. How can something so cute be so cruel?
    Oh, crap, I hope that wasn't a rhetorical question...

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Cassandra: Nathan Bransford has this to say about querying publishers and agents:

    http://blog.nathanbransford.com/2009/09/submitting-to-editors-without-agent.html

    The conference situation seems to be an exception to the general rule.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I finally realized that Illustrious Illustrator was not a real thing/person, but I still can't decide if Dinosaur Train and Shark vs. Train are real picture books.

    ReplyDelete
  30. This sounds like a fantastical picture book! Does anyone know whether it got published?

    ReplyDelete
  31. I thought the father was a psychiatrist until I read the first, rhetorical question.

    ReplyDelete